![ftr player translate to text ftr player translate to text](https://cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net/v1/static/689254975001/df43154e-2b41-41fe-b8c8-ceedba47acef/d82c7551-f951-40bc-a327-7bb47e912008/1280x720/match/image.jpg)
Stephanopoulos was polished like many of the veteran brodcast journalists during the guest run. Strengths: Pronounciation and presentation. But the big surprise was some of his stumbles disseminating the source materal.īottom line: Cooper's presentation was solid for what the show needed, but he wasn't smooth enough overall to stand out as much as he should have. Cooper handled most of the clues and was solid in the introduction and interview portions of the game. Weaknesses: Inconsistency and inaccuracy. His voice, intelligence and polish as a long-time CNN personality were major assets with Trebek-like familiarity to most of the audience. Cooper had previous reality competition experience from the celebrity edition of "The Mole" and has proved to be entertaining in his New Year's Eve gigs with Andy Cohen. But Buzzy is best as a short-term guest only. competing.īottom line: Cohen was a good get in the contestant realm behind Ken Jennings, as other top players such as Brad Rutter and James Holzhauer wouldn't have been as smooth on the other side of the lectern. Although there weren't any true nerves with Cohen, it was clear he was out of his element a little presenting vs. Weaknesses: Inexperience and more inexperience. His spectacled sartorial splendor gave him a blend of television flair and another way to relate to the geek chic of the players. Buzzy knows what's going on behind the buzzer as well as anyone, having won the Tournament of Champions as a contestant. Buzzy Cohenġ0 shows, May 17 to May 28 (Tournament of Champions) He was solid in the interview portion, but the question-answer part had some forced flavor.īottom line: Buck is really good at his day jobs with Fox Sports, but he's not meant to follow Trebek. He focused on Amodio like he was Derek Jeter on the Yankees dynasty. There was perhaps a little too much reaction and commentary when it was needed, especially when the championship run of Matt Amodio was deep and was no longer surprising anyone. Buck has done OK work with NFL, golf and other sports, but he still sounds best when doing baseball games given his presentation style. Weaknesses: Too sports-bally, less game-showy. the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree with his personality, deliver and pedigree. Buck has done everything one could imagine as a Hall of Fame sports broadcaster. He also was subdued and didn't show any of that Trebek charisma.īottom line: Whitaker provided another case of a strong broadcast journalist not made for the full-time transition to educational entertainment. His newsreading style with the answers didn't allow for the usual snappy level of responses. Whitaker's contestants often didn't get through the whole board. But he showed his love of the game and respect for Trebek while taking the lectern. Whitaker, a CBS news veteran, was the least-known choice for the general public. The flavor text often slowed down the pace of her games.īottom line: Guthrie passed for a short-term stint, but she shouldn't think about quitting her TODAY job. Guthrie has a good conversational tone made for the morning newsreading and chat on "The TODAY Show." That same strength led to some choppiness in getting through the answers and providing the correct questions. She proved to be very welcoming with the contestants, providing a warm space for the super intelligent. Guthrie, whose credentials include a law degree from Georgetown, is bright and she matched that with a cheery personality. That may work fine when talking about certain bodily functions, but it didn't translate well to quizmastering.īottom line: Trebek once hosted a show called "The Wizard of Odds." The good doctor didn't provide a worthy sequel. Delivery and diction. For those who aren't fans of his medical programming, they should be aware that Oz is a bit all over the place with his presentation.
![ftr player translate to text ftr player translate to text](https://insmac.org/uploads/posts/2017-12/1512371885_mate-translate_02.jpg)
Instructions to login to Zoom will be posted as part of the meeting packet prior to the meeting date.Weaknesses. Email the Planning Division at the meeting with your name, address, and the specific public hearing item you wish to speak on. Submitting written comments via email to comments will be made part of the record and shared with the Planning Commission and City Council.Residents may provide public comment on all public hearing items included on the evening’s agenda by: The meeting will begin at 5:30 pm and members of the public are encouraged to watch the meeting live online at /PlanningCommission, or at your own convenience once the meeting video is archived within hours of its conclusion. In an effort to follow social distancing guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Olathe Planning Commission will be conducting the April 27 public meeting remotely.